LOT NO.
8

Indian Miniature Painting

A princess seated on a terrace with a parrot and listening to music
opaque pigments with gold and silver on paper
folio 29.4 x 22 cm.
painting 22.2 x 15.6 cm.
ascribed to Kasam son of Ahmad
Bikaner, c. 1750
Starting Bid: $ 2,200
Estimate: US$ 2,500 - 3,500
Starts in

Lot Details

Inscribed on the verso in nagari: majlas janani ki Ahmad Qasam rai betai ko vi samvat 1823 miti Chaitra sudh 12 (‘as assembly of women, the daughters of Ahmad Kasam, on the 12th day of the bright half of the month Chaitra in the year 1823 [AD1776]’)

PROVENANCE
Private collection, USA

A princess is seated in a silver chair on a terrace examining a parrot which is standing on her extended arm after leaving the cage held by an attendant. Two women behind the princess’s chair hold a morchhal and a chowrie, while in front of her stand two female musicians with vina and clappers. An elderly harem guard stands off to the side. Beyond the terrace is an extensive garden.

Kasam son of Ahmad was a known artist in the Umrani genealogy of artists from Bikaner (see N. Krishna, ‘The Umarani Usta Master-Painters of Bikaner and their Genealogy’ in Court Painting in Rajasthan, ed. A. Topsfield, Marg, Bombay, 2000, pp. 57-64). He was the artist of a Rasikapriya set dated 1749 with a signed specimen in the Brooklyn Museum (see Amy G. Poster et al., Realms of Heroism: Indian Paintings at the Brooklyn Museum, New York, 1994, no. 120). His style in that set is rather heavy and densely coloured, but his picture of Lord Krishna dancing on a lotus formerly in the Motichand Khajanchi collection of Bikaner paintings is much lighter in style and more akin to ours (see Saffronart sale, Mumbai, 9 March 2017, no. 1), so that our painting can be attributed to him.

EXPERT : J. P. Losty
J. P. Losty was for many years curator of Indian visual materials in the British Library in London and has published many books and articles on painting in India from the 12th to the 19th centuries.

Artiana would like to thank J. P. Losty for his expertise and assistance in preparing this catalogue entry.

Indian Miniature Painting

Indian Miniature Paintings - an ode to the rich history of classical art in India - are divided into Rajput, Mughal, Deccani, Pahari and other schools, each having their signature stylisations. These paintings, across all the various schools display a strong connection with nature, people and early Indian culture and tradition. Although these pictures seen at a glance, are easily recognized as Indian in origin, they are a confluence of various cultures and traditions. This genre of classical Indian art is also an important window into the past, as the images reliably depict the surroundings and milieu around the time of their execution.

The tradition of Indian miniature painting finds its beginnings around the 7th century ACE. Appearing as text illustrations, these paintings emerged primarily in Jain and Buddhist palm leaf manuscripts. Reaching a high level of sophistication in 15th century, the style grew steadily, sustaining its similarity with other schools of miniature painting while articulating a unique aesthetics of its own. The schools of miniature painting consist of two broad variants – the first centred on Islamic elements unique to Iran and Turkey, and the second an indigenous tradition of India. Indian miniature paintings are famed for its diverse qualities – its myriad themes, subtle aesthetics, stylistic diversity, sensuality, religiosity and the opulent life of the royals to name a few.

Mughal painting sprouted and grew during the Mughal Empire (16th to 19th centuries). It was exclusive to the nobles and royalty its development depended, to a great extent on, the patronage of this class of society. With its origins in Central Asia, the Mughal empire was heavily influenced by Persian cultural trends, which was taken to new heights in India. The paintings are known for its subtlety and appreciation of historical or quasi-scientific themes in nature. Its scientific quality ensured that the paintings were largely secular in nature, consisting of allusions to natural life, literature and the routines of royalty. The Mughals were best known for their fusion of Indo-Islamic culture, and early Emperors — particularly Akbar (1556-1605) — commissioned paintings to illustrate Hindu epics as well as various Persian texts.

The Rajasthani School emerges around the 16th century as an off shoot of the early Mewar paintings. Later several states of Rajasthan had developed their own individual styles of painting, the most prominent amongst them were Kota, Bundi, Bikaner, Kishangarh and Mewar and Jaipur. Rajputs of the time, who patronised the art to a great extent, ensured that it featured themes of religion and literature in a distinct sense. Once Rajasthani Miniature painting came into being, it progressed quickly under local painters. While the influence of the Mughal style was unmistakable, the style retained its unique lyrical temperament and classical worldview.

At the close of the 7th century, the Pahari school of painting developed in the Hills of Punjab, which, at the time, grew in the margins of mainstream culture and art. The lively and romantic school of Pahari miniaturists produced some of the finest religious scenes, offering a glimpse of the daily mind and sentiment of India. The earliest Pahari School of miniature painting is called Basholi. Basholi had produced some wonderful portraits and is famed for its Rasamanjari series. Pahari art, produced in Kangra under Raja Sansar Chand is known for its pronounced rhythmic quality. The Vaishnavite tradition of Hinduism, celebrating the love of Radha and Krishna, bears its distinct stamp of the Kangra style.

Deccani painting grew almost simultaneously with Mughal art, with Ahmednagar, Golkonda, Bijapur, and subsequently Hyderabad as its centres. Most of the painters working at these courts were immigrants of Turkey, Iran and Europe, and had brought with them their artistic idioms and skills. Deccani art attained a great maturity in form and sophistication, acquiring the same regard as Mughal paintings.